Blog

Couple Ruined Her Online Reputation Over $150 Fee; Jury Ordered $1 Million Payout

Couple Ruined Her Online Reputation Over $150; Jury Ordered $1 Million Payout

Last Updated on October 24, 2024 by Steven W. Giovinco

A Cautionary Tale of Twenty-First Century Online Reputation Management Dangers And Three Lessons to Learn 

Things appeared fine for Andrew and Neely Moldovan: a wedding set at an old-world Dallas spot, captured by their chosen photographer.

But according to a Washington Post article by Avi Selk, bliss quickly turned sour months later when the couple stood in front of a local Dallas NBC TV affiliate showing a box of empty picture frames. The problem? Their photographer, Andrea Polito, was withholding their images for $150.

People then began to write negative comments on the photographer’s review pages, calling her a scam artist, or much, much worse.

As a result, her reputation was ruined, the business went from 100 clients to two and she was forced to close.

The story could have ended here and could be chalked up as an example of another case of social media being a Twenty-First Century equalizer of justice.

But, there’s a twist: according to the article, the photographer, Polito, sued the Moldovans, claiming they just need to fill out a form, select their wedding album and pay a small charge they had long known about to get their photos.

Importantly, jurors in the Dallas case agreed with Polito. They found that the accusations by the couple amounted to malicious defamation.

The Moldovans should pay the photographer more than $1 million in damages. 

What can we learn here?

First, “weaponizing” social media is never a good idea, especially when someone just doesn’t want to fulfil their part of the agreement.

It can lead to a range of unexpected consequences and is dangerous.

Second, the same rules apply online as they would “off-line.” Lying about the truth and defaming someone through social media has definite, real-world results–in this case, a photographer’s online reputation was needlessly damaged.

Third, things online can turn ugly quickly, for both sides.
Initially, the photographer’s online reputation was damaged almost immediately. But after news of the truth emerged, the Moldovans’ own online reputation was hurt just as quickly: Neely Moldovan’s fashion blog has been shut down, and the Washington Post article quickly amassed more than seven hundred comments just hours after it was published, many of them extremely negative.

So, be mindful of using social media against someone else–it can cause real online damage to both parties.

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Table of Contents

Free Evaluation

Feel free to reach out at 347-559-4952 or email steve@recoverreputation.com

On Key

Related Posts

Case Study: Fixing Redirect and Indexing Issues to Improve SEO and Online Reputation

Last Updated on November 5, 2024 by Steven W. Giovinco The Problem: Mysterious Redirects and Crawling Issues Affecting Website Visibility What if your web pages don’t show up in Google? Imagine working hard to maintain a site for years, publishing valuable blog posts frequently and providing useful information to readers/clients. One day it seems you

MrBeast’s Challenges: A Case Study in Online Reputation Management

Last Updated on October 21, 2024 by Steven W. Giovinco Introduction MrBeast is a digital phenomenon–you might have heard of him or seen some of his videos. With 320 million subscribers, his influence is massive, going beyond the online realm into restaurants, philanthropy, branding, and merchandise, etc.  But the massive rise has recently come with

Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top